Commentary and chart analysis featuring Elliott Wave Theory, classic TA, and frequent doses of sarcasm from the author who first coined the term "QE Infinity." Published on Yahoo Finance, NASDAQ.com, Investing.com, etc.
Join the ongoing discussion with our friendly, knowledgeable, and collegial forum community here!
Amazon
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
SPX and INDU: Charts from an Alternate Universe
Monday, October 20, 2025
SPX, ES, and INDU Updates: Not Ideal
That said, unless bulls can sustain a breakout over 6723, we do have to respect the three-wave nature of the rally and maybe give a slight edge to bears for the time being. (Do note that there's also one bear pattern that breaks 6723 briefly before getting ugly, so even 6723 isn't a complete failsafe for bulls.)
Let's take a look at why I added that warning, starting with the SPX 24-hour chart (I'll explain its significance afterwards):
The key observation about this chart is the BREAK of the mini-crash low. Yes, there is one potential bull pattern under which such a break would be expected -- but there are at least three potential bear patterns that opened up at that break:
- a b-wave low (which I was indicating via Friday's parenthetical (quoted above))
- a bear nest
- an ending diagonal that still needs a new low
This means, all other things being equal, there are more ways for this to work out in favor of bears than there are for it to work out in favor of bulls -- at least over the near term and as of right this second. I say that because if bulls can clear the red bear 2/B high, then they eliminate options 2 and 3 from that list.
Let's look at the SPX cash chart with EWT labels:
That chart explains itself, as does the red channel chart:
Finally, a more basic look at INDU:
On the chart above: Yes, RSI divergences can run on and on before meaning anything -- but they're not what bulls want to see, because while RSI divergences don't NECESSARILY mean the rally is over, neither do they offer any indication that it isn't. So it's another weak warning flag for bulls.
In conclusion, yes, bulls could still recover the ATH directly, there are no slam dunks here for bears... but this is not an ideal position for bulls at the moment. If bulls can clear the red 2/B high on the first chart, then the picture gets a little fuzzier again. Trade safe.
Friday, October 17, 2025
SPX Update: Bulls Not Out of the Woods Yet (and we all know what lives in the woods...)
Wednesday, October 15, 2025
SPX Update: A Well-behaved Market
Monday, October 13, 2025
SPX Update: A Touch of Grey
In conclusion, the first chart notes that the rally is finally showing some signs of... I don't want to say "exhaustion" just yet, but certainly some lethargy. That said, there's no distinct pattern we can point at as a slam-dunk example of this, but we've seen a lot of overlap and little progress recently -- and that can sometimes be a warning sign. So bulls should at least keep on their eyes open here.
And that turned out to be understated but very much correct. For the record, it's written as it is (with the ellipsis hanging as a marker of where I overrode my first instinct) because the word I originally wanted to use was in fact "exhaustion." But I stopped myself because I couldn't justify that logically since there was nothing concrete in the chart that I could point at. So it would have been "because I say so" (or "because I sense a disturbance in the Force"), which is kind of hard for even me to get behind.
Anyway, I regret not going with my first instinct, but at least I was able to provide an extremely timely, if understated, warning to bulls.
As to where we are now -- well, the market is into that lovely no-man's land between old, largely irrelevant (from an Elliott perspective) support and the actual meaningful support zone (black):
It is quite interesting that black support on the chart above roughly lines up with the next important very long term support zone (below):
So let's cut to the chase here: In another market (meaning: a real, normal market), I'd probably think more downside. In this market, though? I prefer to wait to see what happens at the key levels before pushing out onto any limbs. Because the bottom line is, from a technical Elliott wave perspective, nothing has happened yet and this could just be a particularly violent fourth wave. Even from a standard TA perspective, this could just turn out to be an expected test of old long-term resistance (second chart) before the market moves higher again. In other words: While this could turn into something more significant, it's tempting but simply premature to assume that will happen just yet. Let's first see how the market handles the levels that actually matter. Trade safe.
















