Commentary and chart analysis featuring Elliott Wave Theory, classic TA, and frequent doses of sarcasm from the author who first coined the term "QE Infinity." Published on Yahoo Finance, NASDAQ.com, Investing.com, etc.
Join the ongoing discussion with our friendly, knowledgeable, and collegial forum community here!
Amazon
Thursday, June 19, 2025
SPX, NYA, and Powell Updates
Tuesday, June 17, 2025
SPX and NYA: Trading in Circles
Monday, June 16, 2025
The Market Doesn't Owe Us 'Certainty'
Why Probabilistic Thinking Is Hard (but Essential):How to think about markets, risk, and adaptation.
A common misunderstanding among newer traders deserves
attention — not just because it trips up beginners, but because it points to a
deeper reality that even market veterans sometimes forget.
Market analysis is, first and foremost, about interpreting
potentials and probabilities. There is no such thing as a "sure
thing" when it comes to trading and investing. The analysis I
favor, Elliott Wave Theory, allows me to assess the structure of
the market and then project likely outcomes: "If the market does X,
then it's likely to do Y." These projections are probabilities, not
guarantees.
Veteran traders already understand this. But for those newer
to markets, the best parallel I can offer is poker. If you’ve played, you know
that over time, probabilities work out according to the law of large numbers. A
strong hand might lose six times in a row, leading you to conclude that the
universe hates you… then it wins 15 times in a row. That doesn’t mean the
probabilities were wrong. It means the distribution played out.
That’s why no one should ever trade as if their analysis is perfect — because probabilities never are. Even if one could read every pattern perfectly, the nature of probabilistic systems means that sometimes the lower-odds outcome will still occur.
That’s what stop loss orders are for. One advantage to
Elliott Wave is that it typically provides clear areas for invalidation.
But the key understanding — for all forms
of analysis — is that markets are not static pictures to be labeled and filed
away; they are dynamic, recursive systems always in motion. Patterns
should not be treated as fixed destinies; they are simply possibilities
still unfolding, always subject to change.
Too often, analysts will classify a formation — “ending
diagonal, therefore bearish” — and let their thinking stop there. But
effective market analysis requires a live, continuously updated decision tree:
every pattern may morph, extend, or nest within a higher-order wave as new data
emerges.
Patterns exist temporally, sometimes only partially formed —
not as fixed objects occupying finite space. So that apparent “bearish ending
diagonal” could instead be the early phases of a still-developing bull nest…
and so on.
Fractal analysis — such as Elliott Wave — demands that one
hold multiple scenarios open at all times. The prudent approach is to model not
just what seems most likely now, but what could become
likely if the structure shifts.
If X occurs, it may confirm scenario A, or
if Y, then B
yet there is always the possibility of Z — a branch that could suddenly
dominate, even if it was once improbable.
This is not a weakness in the method, but a recognition of
the underlying reality:
Ambiguity is the natural state of complex systems.
The market punishes those who seek comfort in “sure-thing”
predictions or who collapse all potential paths into a single, rigid narrative.
Insistence on black-and-white answers may feel reassuring, but it fundamentally
misinterprets the system. The real skill lies in embracing uncertainty —
keeping multiple branches alive, updating models as new information arrives,
and remaining responsive to the evolving structure.
People don’t like to do this, because it’s cognitively
demanding. This is why we prefer to collapse uncertainty into certainty (and
not just in markets; in everything): Holding multiple possible
threads open at once can make us feel ungrounded — and the more threads, the
more ungrounded.
Yet in a dynamic, ever-shifting environment, the map
is always provisional.
And success depends on the ability to adapt rather than the hope for certainty.
The bottom line is this: The market isn’t a clock. It
doesn’t tick along with rigid, mechanical predictability. It’s a dynamic
mechanism that shifts with every new key reversal or confirmation.
What appears possible today may become impossible tomorrow.
And the thing is, given the reality of a dynamic market, all valid
forms of analysis must evolve in response.
Even fundamental analysis has to adjust. Imagine
analysts project Apple will sell 40 million iWidgets next year — and then a
recession hits and sales fall short. That analysis must revise its
expectations. The underlying thesis changes with new data.
But it’s human nature to want to dumb everything down. To
make it black-and-white. To seek simple answers that let us go back to watching
Netflix or arguing with nimrods on X.
Unfortunately, markets — and life — don’t work that way.
If you're here to learn how to better engage with a complex
system, then welcome.
But remember: Even the best analysis isn't about certainty.
It's about mapping the uncertainty.
And, perhaps even more importantly: Trading itself is
about managing one’s risk accordingly.
Sunday, June 15, 2025
SPX and NYA: Cracks Forming -- But Will It Actually Break?
That said, be aware that IF the highly speculative 1?? and 2?? on the near-term SPX chart happen to be unfolding, then these early downside targets might be VERY conservative. Because if this is a second wave decline, then its job would be to convince everyone that the bear market is resuming -- which implies a deep and scary decline, potentially of 500 points or more.And it also bears mention that SPX did not reclaim its all-time high -- which means that if the decline gets teeth, then it's not outside the realm of possibilities that the bear market IS resuming, so we should be aware of that, as well. But before we even consider going there, let's see how bears handle these potential support zones first.
Trade safe.
Thursday, June 12, 2025
SPX and NYA Updates: What to Watch Next
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
NYA, SPX, and Jerome Powell Updates
Last update prompted an angry letter from Jerome "the Gnome" Powell, which I will reprint here in its entirety [sic]:
Dear Mister Pretzel Logic,
I sawed ewe said a thing about me. Its KNOT TREW! Stop spredding lyes or eye'll be forced to SEW you!
Jerome Powell
Chairmen of the Fed Earl Rezerve
p.s.- STOP CALLING ME "THE NOME"!!111
Of course, it's never the intention of these updates to foster ill feelings among our feckless fearless leaders, so in the interest of goodwill, my lawyers have reached out to Jerome "the Gnome." Hopefully we can get things patched up, which Jerome can do while he's sewing.
The market has, of course, continued to drift higher, like a balloon filled with lukewarm air. But hey, NYA's chart is of at least minor note -- which is something, anyway:
COMPQ, INDU, and SPX all display near-term patterns that are similar to the rising wedge on NYA -- so it's worth keeping an eye on -- especially since SPX is still bouncing along the underside of the generational black trend line:
Near-term, the black trendline is still the first to watch -- but now, the UPPER red trend line (dashed) could act as first support, so bears would have to whipsaw that (even if black fails) before they'd have a shot at the solid red trendline:
First support is a little easier to see on the near-term chart:
In conclusion, multiple markets have formed apparent "rising wedges" -- but these patterns are not always bearish and can instead suggest a new (minor) launch pad... so we need to keep an eye on the support zones for further clues. Trade safe.















