Amazon

Sunday, October 23, 2011

SPX and Dow Update: Stocks at a Critical Inflection Point

Here's what I know for certain:  there's a big move coming.  

With the new high on Friday, stocks have reached a critical inflection point which could drastically change the expectations and projections going forward.  Since the rally began, I have been anticipating a moderate-to-deep B-wave retracement.  If we don't reverse before reaching the price levels outlined below, that prior expectation will be nullified.

In Elliott Wave, you must evolve your counts as the market dictates.  Just as in life, you must actively change with the changes, or be left behind.  Some Elliotticians find a count and stick to it, no matter what the market is telling them... in fact, this is a much easier approach for the technician as he can chart much more quickly each day.  If this is the approach you are looking for, then my updates are probably not a good fit for you.

My approach is to continually challenge my assumptions each and every day, as new price information becomes available. I then report my findings here.  I will strive to communicate when my previous interpretation was wrong, and when the assumptions have changed.

The short-term wave structure presented to us by the S&P 500 (SPX) and other indices has been a challenge to decipher.  My best guess, which I presented in the last two updates, was that we had completed wave 4 as a sideways correction and were due one more lunge to new highs, which would then whipsaw.  I am still favoring this interpretation.  However, time and price are running out for the market to honor this.

The good news is, the drop-dead level for this count is not too far away.  I have charted many different indices this weekend in the search for greater clarity.  After studying countless charts, I believe the Dow may hold the key to deciphering this move.  See chart below:


The best thing about the Dow is that it's very close to the knockout level for this count.  Due to the length of the third wave, and the rule under Elliott Theory that the third wave cannot be the shortest wave, the knockout level for this count is 11,993 (11,992.37 to be precise).  Thus, we should have a definitive answer on this count in short order. 

The Dow has completed five clear waves to the upside, so the move up could end at any time... but, based on the one-minute charts, I am anticipating a little more upside to complete the move.  Futures are down slighly as I write this, so it remains to be seen.  We know which levels to watch on the upside; here are some concrete things to watch for on the downside:  a move below the bottom line of the red trendchannel would be the solid warning of a trend change, and a move below the blue Wave 1 high would be complete confirmation.

The updated SPX chart is shown below.  The labeling on this chart is slightly different than the Dow, and shows a potential ending diagonal, which I first proposed on Wednesday.  The ending diagonal may or may not hold true.  If we were to label this chart in a similar fashion to the Dow (see gray "alt: 4" annotation), then the ending diagonal becomes unnecessary.


So that's my preferred interpretation.  I am still expecting a whipsaw here, but the charts are far from definitive -- which is pretty much always the case at tops and bottoms.  However, in the event that I'm wrong, I feel it's important to show an alternate, more bullish interpretation.

The more bullish interpretation would be that we already completed the B-wave.  This is certainly technically possible, but the structure just doesn't look right to me, based on the smallest waveforms... however, the possibility can't be confirmed or ruled out yet.  The chart below is the bullish alternate labeling for the SPX:

    
It's probably safe to say that, at this point, most traders believe this rally is going to continue.  And it well may.  But at this moment, based on my best interpretation of the wave structure, I continue to be of the opinion that this is a fake-out. 

As I said earlier, though, the good news is the answer isn't far away.  If we trade above 11,992.37 on the Dow, then my prediction of a whipsaw will be off the table, and I will have to give weight to the more bullish alternate count. 

The charts are telling us there's a big move coming.  Since we know the levels to watch, the next few sessions should hold the answer as to which direction that move will be.

(**Please note there was a typo in Friday's article regarding the Russell 2000 (RUT): the text states that 731 should contain any rallies in the RUT based on the count shown on the chart; it should read 739.)

The original article, and many more, can be found at http://PretzelCharts.blogspot.com

102 comments:

  1. futures are slightly up now.

    Do you know of a place where I can set an alert for the DOW at the 11993 level?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Futures are up, the indexes feel like they just want to keep going higher... Also the Euro is on its way to test the 1.40 level, which should be critical resistance for the Euro... We should find out very soon whether your preferred count is correct or are we onto the alternate wave C count

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pretzel,

    Since the indexes are pretty much led by the movement of the Euro during the trading session (does anyone notice how long this phenomenon has been like this?) Can you do an Elliot wave analysis on the euro?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ugh, Forex. :) Stockcharts gives terrible data on forex, which means I have to screen-shot my account charts and annotate in Photoshop.

    Beyond that, I'd be starting from scratch, since I've never done a LT Euro chart. It would literally take me several days, and it's hard to find the extra time. Might be a project to work on bit by bit, though.

    Just went and glanced at it. FWIW, Euro looks due a pull-back to between 1.371-1.382 over the short term.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anon -- Optionsxpress has pretty good "if... then" trades. Not sure if that answers your question.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Traditional TA would have a false break of the rectangle to the down side (1075) and revert quickly back inside the box and break the opposite side of the rectangle (up) (happening now) with a target around 1350 area. That jive well with your alternate count. Just don't look at the fundamentals, that's a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh, and to answer "does anyone notice how long this phenomenon has been like this?" -- roughly since 2003. They're definitely not perfectly correlated, though.

    For example, during the last bear, the Euro topped in July '08, many months after the SPX; then it bottomed in Nov. '08, months ahead of the SPX.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anon- Yeah, fundamentals are almost obsolete for trading these days. It's all about the printing presses.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If the printing presses are determining the rally's, then how can EW predict it?

    Also I read that the reason for the rally was that the I banks and hedge funds turned on their computer tradings and volume spiked.

    How does EW which is based on history is able to predict current markets when it is built upon knowledge when these technologies weren't available?

    just questions that came in my mind, not attacking EW or your work.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anon- fair question.

    It's the same reason head and shoulders patterns and triangles still work.

    Even back in the 20's, the same thing drove markets: liquidity. The market has always been -- and always will be -- liquidity driven.

    And the herd acts in predictable ways, no matter what or who is behind the liquidity pumps.

    Make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Looking like I made a pretty good ST call on the Euro earlier... down from 1.395 to 1.386 so far.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I count 5 waves down on the dollar to complete C of the second wave, as I talked about Monday last week.

    http://pretzelcharts.blogspot.com/2011/10/dollar-verging-on-huge-rally-gold.html

    Unless there's a fifth wave extension, the dollar may be getting ready to launch here.

    Gold, on the other hand, looks like it may still be correcting. Only a 3-wave move so far, so tough to confirm or deny at this stage.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If the dollar clears 77.79, it should be off the races.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks for the concise analysis and clear price signals to watch for.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Pretzel,

    I may be a bit premature by I would say the ED count is dead at this point. Although (as we discussed last week) my preferred count right now is that last week was wave 4 of wave C that began at the 10/4 low (with a failed 5th), the end result would be pretty much the same as your count that last week was the low of wave B. Both counts would suggest a test of the falling 200 day SMA around 1275 is likely, although my count would say that is about the max upside limit and your count would allow for much higher targets.

    ReplyDelete
  16. From cycle standpoint alot of similarities to 2007 this year especially for NDX. Both years had a sharp decline after February expiration and an important low around mid-March. Both had a rally into mid-July and then a very sharp decline into mid August. And then in 2007 the NDX rallied into it's bull market top in the final trading day of October and then retested that top in the first couple of trading days of November and that was all she wrote. Will history repeat or at least rhyme this year? My cycle work is suggesting it will.

    ReplyDelete
  17. CTP- Agree, ED is dead. (reminds me of Pulp Fiction: "Zed's dead, baby, Zed's dead.")

    SPX should be finishing this wave right about now @ 1249. I'm expecting it to start correcting here... now we see if the wave it's finishing is wave 5 of A (or C) or wave 1 of C. I believe your count would be 1 of 5 of C.

    ReplyDelete
  18. In the next 2 weeks I have a couple of turn dates which don't specify polarity, they are 10/27 +/- 1 and 11/4 +/- 1... I have been expecting 10/27 +/- 1 to be a high, but if we were to get a blow-off type short covering panic today then I could see that followed by a pullback into 10/27 +/- 1 and then a final rally into 11/4 +/- 1. In fact I am starting to favor that interpretation especially if NDX can break last week's high today.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Pretzel,

    Yes 5 of C is my count, but I think 5 is going to subdivide and today's rally would end 3 of 5 of C... time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I could be wrong, but I would not be too quick to fade this rally today, it feels to me like a trend up day today and possible short covering panic in the making.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yeah, this move off 1074 has been something. I remarked a while back that it reminded me a lot of March '09. I spotted something in the charts this weekend that I'm actually very hesitant to post, but it could blow the whole bear case out of the water. I haven't posted it because I simply have too hard a time suspending disbelief.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Sharp eye Pretzel ;-) ... I have been watching the analog to the rally off the March 2009 low somewhat it disbelief as well but cognizant of the fact that we have been tracking almost exactly thus far.

    ReplyDelete
  23. If you're still there, I'll post if for you real quick, then I'm gonna delete it. Still there?

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I saw it too... heheh.

    With money printing press going on in full gear by the Euro zone and the US, I can believe it! But let's see if the bears can defend that 200 SMA line first.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yep! :)

    There all plenty of bullish counts out there but nobody including myself can bring themselves to believe them given the fundamental backdrop. If I was from the planet Mars and just landed here without any knowledge of the economic fundamentals or news I and just looked at the charts I would probably be long-term bullish :o

    ReplyDelete
  27. SPIES! Damnit. I knew I shoulda used a secure line! :D

    ReplyDelete
  28. I guess I haven't seen that particular interpretation. I've seen people labeling the entire decline as (a), but with (b) and (c) to come.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Pretzel,

    Are we now watching for 1275 on the SPX now?

    ReplyDelete
  30. I guess I should clarify. There are plenty of ways to count the market as bullish, but I have not seen anyone consider them yet. The count you showed I have not seen anywhere on the internet, but I had considered it myself. I've had super bull counts waiting in the wings for a while now, but I just can't swallow them at this point, not with this gigantic debt overhang. We would need a Jubilee type event (debt forgiveness on a massive scale) in order to have the fundamental backdrop support the super bull counts.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I've got 1257-1261 as next hurdle, then the all important 1275.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Sorry I am just a number, support/resistance, trend-following guy, not fully understanding the wave count mechanism yet... :-)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Frank always wants to throw out my preffered count and go right to the alternates. ;)

    No, Frank, I'm not ready to concede! I will go down swinging! The bears have mounted a massive defense at 1250, we're already down like a point and a half! The crash has started! LOB! :o

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  34. So we should expect a small pull back before a final launch to 1275 test of the 200 SMA?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Sorry for jumping the gun Pretzel,

    I should be patient....

    Zen is very important in trading :-)

    ReplyDelete
  36. CTP- yeah, with the fundamental backdrop, it's hard to imagine a massive third wave coming in here... 'course it was hard to imagine the B wave coming in when it did, given the fundamentals. That one, I was largely expecting though, 'cause it was in the charts. One could argue that maybe the third wave is in the charts too...

    ReplyDelete
  37. This rally, you'd have done better just sticking with support/resistance. The Rally from Hell... as I said, reminds me of March '09. Bears kept shorting, waiting for pullbacks that never really materialized.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Nasdaq is ripping today. Playing catch up after last week's under-performance. If the bears can't bring it within the next hour I would say we have a major squeeze setting up into the close.

    ReplyDelete
  39. NDX is gonna be trouble for the bear case if it breaks the July high... 60 pts away now?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Definitely has the feel of a wave 3 of something today IMHO. Per my preferred count this is 3 of 5 of C off the 10/4 low. Ideal scenario is short covering panic into close today to finish off wave 3, then chop sideways to down into 10/27 +/- 1 for 4 of 5 of C. Then final 5 of 5 of C thrust into 11/4 +/- 1 and the bear resumes with a vengeance. Come on Mr. Market follow my script ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  41. Problem with the bull case is that I still do not see volume behind this rally. To get a sustained bull trend we need volume. But I guess they can come in later...

    ReplyDelete
  42. If my preferred count falls apart, I'm just gonna let you run the blog from now on. ;)

    Me? I'm gonnna take up spear-fishing, or knitting, or beer pong, or something.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yeah, volume is pretty lame. Still smells like primarily short-covering to me.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The lack of volume doesn't surprise me if this is indeed one gigantic short squeeze which my preferred count says it is. The volume will come in at the top when the bears capitulate en masse.

    ReplyDelete
  45. March 09 the rally showed very convincing volume early on... This rally - no volume. I am not ready to concede to the bulls yet either.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Pretzel LOL!... I can't see that wave like you do, I just try to fit wave scenarios to my cycle work. The cycle stuff is my strength. We do much better as a team ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  47. Frank,

    Yes we are in the same camp. But they are going to make it very convincing before it finally rolls over. Need to have mass capitulation of bears first, so it is going to get real painful for the shorts near term IMHO...

    ReplyDelete
  48. Pretzel,

    There is one part about the market I don't quite understand: If the majority needs to be wrong and fooled by the market before the market reveals its true move, which makes sense, but doesn't the big money move the market? Doen't the majority have the most money? Or is it really like the wealth gap in general - where the minority has the most money in the market as well?

    ReplyDelete
  49. RSI hinting all we saw so far was 1-2, 1-2 and this is 3. I think my labeling of 4 on the Dow chart is correct, CTP. If this is wave 5 of your C count, I think it started on the 20th... otherwise, it's gonna likely be too big.

    ReplyDelete
  50. 1261 SPX is gonna be a tough nut to crack IMHO... that is likely where we top wave 3 of 5 of C today.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Pretzel,

    Yes that's where I have it wave 4 bottom on 10/20.

    ReplyDelete
  52. No, it's a matter of supply/demand. When everyone is bullish, that means they've already invested -- so there's more supply than demand... nobody left to buy.

    Conversely, when everyone's bearish, they've already sold, and there's nobody left in the market but buyers. Buyers with no sellers drives prices higher.

    Make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Frank,

    Yes the smart money is maybe 5-10% of traders but controls probably 90% of the $$$, just like the wealth gap in real world.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Pretzel,

    One other way to count it is if we put the wave 4 low on 10/18 and today is an extended 5th of a wave 3 that started 10/20.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Pretzel,

    After all your call about AAPL making one final e2 to retest the top again may happen?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Frank- It could. But Apple has a pretty ugly island reversal top.

    ReplyDelete
  57. CTP,

    I was one of those bears who got squeezed hehehe.. Luckily I was only testing this rally with tiny positions and covered today.

    ReplyDelete
  58. 1261 SPX should be good for a short trade.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Alright, boyz (I guess I'm making assumptions with gender), I gotta split. You're welcome to keep talking here, it's not like I need to be present to moderate or something.

    GL,

    Frank, good work protecting that capital.

    CTP, seems like you've got this one pegged pretty well.

    Catch ya later today. :)

    ReplyDelete
  60. per my ideal roadmap would like to see 1261-1267 top of wave 3 of 5, then a couple days pullback that holds above 1240, then final pop to 1275 before bear resumes.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Thanks Pretzel. Catch up with ya later.

    Best,
    CTP

    ReplyDelete
  62. Thanks Pretzel,

    Looking forward to tonight's update.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Oh, and one last thing before I split:

    Just for the record, the preferred count ain't dead yet! Not until Dow 11,993 goes. :)

    ReplyDelete
  64. could wednesday be the turn around day?

    http://etfdailynews.com/2011/10/24/days-of-reckoning-mark-your-calendar-for-2-historic-days-that-could-shake-wall-st-tza-vxx-faz-tna-tbt/

    ReplyDelete
  65. Nice link, thanks.

    It jives with the structure, which looks like a day or two max to complete... and I'm thinking after the technical breakout from the range, it's going to take a big event to bring out the sellers.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Copper ripping today as well. Watch 3.50 area where C=A of an A-B-C corrective flat off the 10/4 low. That would be where bear market should resume for risk assets.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Also looking forward to your update tonight. I want to see how things have changed since then but it seems like you're turning less bearish and towards the bull interpretation.

    CTPTrader can you link us to your chart?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Just a quick possible real-time count from my completely exhausted brain. Now I swear I'm going to sleep! :)

    http://www.screencast.com/t/OltwVNKf

    ReplyDelete
  69. Anon:

    More than anything, I just need sleep. This is playing out a little stronger than the preferred count would like, but not impossibly strong.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Anon,

    I'll link to some charts later tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Tactically speaking I would imagine we are going to get to EU officials playing down prospects for Wednesday in order to simmer down the expectations, so I would not be surprised to see the market pullback and trade nervously into Wednesday after today's squeeze has run it's course. Then the focus should shift the the 11/2 Fed meeting and 11/3-4 G-20 meetings. That is the window where I would expect a major turn coincident with my 11/4 +/- 1 cycle turn date.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Aussie Dollar ripping today too, that is the favorite currency for "risk on". I am watching 1.0450 basis December futures as an important resistance area.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Dow a-b-c rally, should turn down right here. If it breaks the prior high, which is only like 10 Dow points, I'm wrong. ;)

    I really need to sleep, but I can't stop watching the damn ticker. :(

    ReplyDelete
  74. Gonna be away from the computer for the next couple of hours. Expecting a finish at or close to the highs today and that should be a good short IMO...

    ReplyDelete
  75. Nope... it was a leading diagonal. Those tricky bastards. Probably make a run at the 11940's now. All right, I'm outta here.

    ReplyDelete
  76. why again is 739 a steel beam above for the RUT?
    I'm in TZA right now, just wondering if I should hold on or bail at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I'm back... We're fading a bit into the close and we came within 4 points of my 1261 target at the intraday high so that might have been it for wave 3 of 5 of C. Still could get a gap up tomorrow morning to finish it off but that would be a huge gift for shorting IMO... From here I would expect a pullback to hold either above 1233 or 1240 depending on whether the wave 4 low was on 10/18 or 10/20 (and I can come up with valid counts for either one). Basically 1233 has to hold for my preferred count to remain valid and to set up a further runup to 1275 SPX. Otherwise today was THE top of the rally from 10/4 which Pretzel counts as wave A but I am counting as wave C... Hope that wasn't to confusing. :)

    ReplyDelete
  78. FWIW I am flipping long to short at the close today.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I agree with CTP that this is a good spot to initiate short positions here, whether we are at:

    1) Pretzel's preferred count - approaching top of wave A ;
    2) Pretzel's alternate count - approaching top of wave iii of v in Wave C

    These are good inflexion points to test short positions. Either wave there is potentially one more leg up so I guess I wouldn't get too
    leveraged in shorts here.., just testing the water

    GL to all

    ReplyDelete
  80. I bought SPXU today. Hopefully it pans out.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Pretzel/CTP:

    It sounds you both are certain a big move is coming for the markets. Direction is still unclear, but we should know more very shortly. Is it possible to have another big move up after a 17% move in 15 trading days? If the big move is going to be to the upside, what sort of time frame are we referring to (weeks, months, year, etc...)?

    ReplyDelete
  82. Rocky- 739 would be IF the alternate count has the correct placement for 1 and 3. The rally is far from crystal clear as to labeling, though, so there's definitely room for interpretation. I'm really looking forward to some nice impulse waves to the downside again... the wave structure is always much cleaner when they're moving in line with the larger trend. Counter-trend is always trickier; as are the major turning points at trend changes, imo.

    ReplyDelete
  83. blackjak,

    I don't see a big move to the upside from here. I expect we are going to be topping over the next week and the next big move will be to the downside. Now that interpretation may change depending on the character of the next intermediate-term pullback but for now my expectation is ST pullback over next couple days, then one last ST pop to 1275 SPX before the bear resumes.

    ReplyDelete
  84. CTP - at this point, if this is A, it would likely have to be part of a massive flat. Anything else, and the NDX blows up the counts.

    It certainly feels like a C wave of some form; this sure seems like 3rd wave energy. Most likely, it's either C of Minor (2) of the A-B-C alternate count going back into August (shown in black on the above charts), or it's C of the count shown in the last chart in this article... but again, I have a hard time seeing how that count won't blow up the NDX.

    That whole consolidation mess leading out of August is what makes this a challenge right now. There's no clear-cut form there, which leaves enough question marks to make this rally challenging to position.

    Even looking at 2007/early '08 analogs isn't much help. The wave structure preceeding that rally was cleaner, and this rally has been much more unrelenting than that one was.

    ReplyDelete
  85. CTP, wouldn't a move to 1275 turn up all your longer term cycles? I'm not really a Hurst guy, but that's what my Hurst trader friends are telling me.

    ReplyDelete
  86. blackjak-

    We're talking short-intermediate term on time frames. And yes, obviously I am favoring the next move as down... but there could be more pain for bears before that happens.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Pretzel,

    Yes I am strongly in the camp that this is the C wave of a Minor 2 flat starting at the August low. Main reasons for that are that it is the only count that can be reconciled with NDX and it also fits with my cycle work.

    As far as a move the 1275 turning up my longer-term cycles, the answer to that is a bit complicated. Basically I have taken the Hurst methodology and have backtested various mechanical system based off of it. In doing that I only found 2 sub-cycles that could be used to form profitable trading system. The long-term cycles you refer were not consistent enough and to open to interpretation to be useful from my studies. So, in essence that way I use Hurst methods is unique and thus I would not expect to find anyone out there who would interpret the cycles the same way that I do. That said, a move to 1275 SPX would not turn my cycle work bullish.

    ReplyDelete
  88. CTP-

    Thanks for the answer. That's pretty cool, actually.

    Just looking at the NDX chart now. On the 60 minute, you can see a very clear 1-2-3-4, and on the 5-minute, can see 1-2-3, with 4 likely in process. 5 is gonna practically bump its head on the prior high, which would be about perfect.

    I'm going to post those charts in tonight/tomorrow's update.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Charting now for tomorrow's update... wait 'til you see the SPX chart CTP.

    ReplyDelete
  90. ah excited. I want to see it as well

    ReplyDelete
  91. Pretzel,

    Do you use Gann angle for your analysis?

    ReplyDelete
  92. Im guessing the update is tomorrow and not today?

    ReplyDelete
  93. http://elliottwavepredictions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/DJIA-120m-10-24-11-example.png

    what do you think of this count?

    ReplyDelete
  94. First anon:

    Working on the update now, and, here in Hawaii, it's still technically "today." ;) 10:30 p.m. here.

    Second anon:

    His count of the correction is very similar to the one I posted in the Weekend Discussion charts. But I'm glad you shared it anyway, because he caught a potential ST triangle in the Dow that has caused me to update the max price to 12,093.50.

    ReplyDelete
  95. CTP - Glad to see you back 

    ReplyDelete
  96. Vulture, what in the hell are you doing on this ancient thread, lol. 

    ReplyDelete